Muslim Leaders, Opposition Welcome Supreme Court's Ruling on UP Madrassa Education Act

The Supreme Court’s decision upholding the 2004 UP Madrassa Education Act has been welcomed by Muslim leaders and opposition parties. They praised the ruling for securing madrassas' autonomy and contributions to public service, while opposition voices criticized the BJP for attempting to undermine constitutional rights.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to uphold the 2004 Uttar Pradesh Board of Madrassa Education Act has been warmly received by Muslim religious leaders and opposition parties, who see it as a victory for the autonomy of madrassas. Maulana Khalid Rashid Farangi Mahali from the All India Muslim Personal Law Board stated that the ruling allows madrassas to operate freely, ensuring that institutions serving thousands continue without interference.

The All India Shia Personal Law Board’s Maulana Yasoob Abbas highlighted madrassas' contributions to India, noting that they have produced numerous IAS, IPS officers, and other public servants. He emphasized that while specific institutions could face scrutiny for violations, madrassas as a whole should not be viewed with suspicion.

The Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind’s Maulana Kab Rashidi also praised the verdict as a significant message, signaling the protection of madrassas’ educational role. He mentioned openness to dialogue on educational reforms but insisted that any imposed changes must respect constitutional boundaries.

Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) leader Mayawati remarked that the Supreme Court’s ruling ends uncertainty over madrassas' future, emphasizing the need for its proper implementation to ensure stability for these institutions. Meanwhile, the Samajwadi Party criticized the BJP, accusing the party of attempting to strip citizens of their rights. Party spokesperson Fakhrul Hasan argued that the BJP’s stance on madrassas reflects a broader bias against minorities.

Also Read: Gujarat Officer Dies in Crash During Liquor Smuggling Pursuit

The Supreme Court’s ruling reverses a 2006 Allahabad High Court decision that declared the Act unconstitutional. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud clarified that a statute can only be invalidated if the state lacks legislative authority, noting that the High Court’s earlier judgment was mistaken.