Mitchell Johnson Critiques David Warner's Test Exit: A Retrospective Analysis

Former Australian cricketer Mitchell Johnson has strongly criticized David Warner's planned Test cricket retirement, citing his recent performance and handling of the ball-tampering scandal. Johnson questions Warner's right to choose his exit, slamming selectors' decisions and suggesting favoritism within the cricketing hierarchy.

Image Source -www.timesnownews.com

Former Australian fast bowler Mitchell Johnson recently launched a blistering critique directed at his former teammate, David Warner, regarding Warner's intended retirement from Test cricket. Johnson's outspoken remarks centered on Warner's lackluster performance in recent years and his allegedly unjustified authority to determine his retirement date.

Johnson, known for his aggressive bowling during his playing days, expressed dismay over Warner's perceived privilege to dictate the terms of his Test cricket exit. In a column published in The West Australian, Johnson questioned why a struggling Test opener like Warner could decide his retirement date and receive what he deemed a hero's farewell. He highlighted Warner's relatively subpar batting record over the past three years, implying that such a performance did not warrant the privilege of choosing one's retirement.

The former left-arm pacer didn't hold back in his criticism, calling out Warner's alleged failure to take full responsibility for the infamous ball-tampering scandal that rocked Australian cricket. Johnson emphasized that even after five years, Warner hadn't truly owned up to his role in the controversy, indicating a lack of accountability.

Also Read: BJP's Victory: Shivraj Singh Chouhan Credits 'Modi Magic' For Madhya Pradesh Win

Johnson also targeted George Bailey, the chief selector of the Australian men's cricket team, questioning his decision-making regarding Warner's farewell series. He insinuated that Bailey's close association with players, having played alongside Warner, might have influenced the favorable treatment extended to the embattled opener. Johnson raised concerns about the evolving role of the head selector, suggesting it had moved towards a more intimate involvement with players, potentially compromising impartial decision-making.

The criticism from Johnson, a former cricketing icon, has sparked discussions about fairness and objectivity in Australian cricket circles. His commentary has put a spotlight on the handling of player exits, especially regarding those with controversial histories, prompting a closer examination of the selection process and its potential biases.